Articles delegate-en/1390-1400 of [1-5033] on the server localhost:7119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 1390 - 1400   digest:
RFC1123 violation w/ delegate SMTP-SMTP
  11/02-16:35 . 1390  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [85]
___ Hi, Adding DeleGate's version was a trial to inform the client side software to help shooting delivery trouble ... At that time I did not know a SMTP implementation which cause a troble with the ext
Time Outs
  11/02-18:06 . 1391  Torben Janssen <pnmcqbdyi-qa4rnuaaqly6.ml@delegate.org> [96]
___ Hi, thanks for your quick answer. The errormessage: Cannot Connect Connection failed by DeleGate on `dummbo.home.net:8080' Tried from the client keineahnung.home.net:1087 to the server http://www.le
  11/02-18:33 . 1392  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [43]
___ Both the error message and the following log seem to show that TCP connection is not possible from your host of DeleGate to the host of the destination server. Are you sure that you can connect to t
Wingate Server and Delegate
  11/04-00:42 . 1393  poecqbdyi-qa4rnuaaqly6.ml@delegate.org (Fadi Towfic) [16]
___ Hi, Thanks for your time, the Delegate server is very helpful for Network admins/Home users! I am currently dual booting between Windows 98SE and Redhat Linux 7.1. I use Wingate Server to share my i
Time Outs
  11/04-20:43 . 1394  "Torben Janssen" <pnmcqbdyi-qa4rnuaaqly6.ml@delegate.org> [68]
___ Hi, you're right. The delegate server can't connect to these sites. It's very strange, but it seems to be not a delegate bug. thank you very much. I'll try to find the problem so I can use delegate
Wingate Server and Delegate
  11/05-04:58 . 1395  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [14]
___ Sorry but I know nothing about WinGate thus I don't know how to make DeleGate to act like it... Cheers, Yutaka @ @ Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://www.delegate.org/y.sato/ ( - ) National In
Transparent Proxy & delegate
  11/08-03:32 . 1396  Attilio Vaccaro <poqcqbdyi-qa4rnuaaqly6.ml@delegate.org> [13]
___ Hi, is it possible to use delegate as a transparent SOCKS proxy? What I would like to do is to have a delegate daemon running on a firewall manage the traffic coming from a private subnet and resend
  11/08-12:49 . 1397  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [20]
___ # delegated -P1080 SERVER=socks CONNECT=s SOCKS="anotherSOCKSserver:1080:*" will do. Cheers, Yutaka @ @ Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://www.delegate.org/y.sato/ ( - ) National Institute of
  11/08-13:03 . 1398  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [30]
___ Or more simply the following will do. # delegated -P1080 SERVER=tcprelay://anotherSOCKSserver:1080 In both case, note that you may have to sepcify a PERMIT parameter or so to give access permission
  11/09-16:26 . 1399  Attilio Vaccaro <poqcqbdyi-qa4rnuaaqly6.ml@delegate.org> [68]
___ Thanks for your answer, but I fear that it's not what I'm looking for. I'd need to send to the SOCKS server all the SOCKSable traffic passing through the gateway running delegate, but not directed t
  11/12-18:33 . 1400  Emmanuel Cerisier <ppacqbdyi-qa4rnuaaqly6.ml@delegate.org> [99]
___ Hi Yutaka, I couldn't get trough posting to your ML, so I send directly this query to feedback@delegate.org, hoping you'll approve it and post it to the newsgroup/ML. Thanks, Regards Emmanuel Cerisi
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:05/22 01:05:51 (1 sec) Expires:05/22 07:05:50 @_@V