Articles delegate-en/3500-3550 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 3500 - 3550   digest:
File download blocking
  09/22-07:30 . 3500  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [24]
___ Hi, It depends on the usage of your DeleGate. If you are using DeleGate as a HTTP proxy (with SERVER=http without other MOUNTs), it can be as follows basically: MOUNT="*%S.exe = forbidden" MOUNT="*%
  09/22-07:40 . 3501  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [29]
___ Or it can be as this for DeleGate as a FTP proxy or a reverse proxy with other MOUNTS: MOUNT="*%S.exe /dev/null pri=1" MOUNT="*%S.mp3 /dev/null pri=1" Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate
  09/22-09:27 . 3502  Macka316 <pvmgqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [69]
___ Yutaka, many thanks for your response, it worked great! Also many thanks for sharing your excellent software. Macka.
Delegate ftp to sftp
  09/22-15:56 . 3503  "Mikko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sipil=E4?=" <pv4gqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [262]
___ Hello, Delegate seems to be that what I have been looking for. Unfortunately I found the following bug when trying to use Delegate as a gateway from ftp to sftp on Redhat Linux (32bit). 1. Command "
  09/22-16:02 . 3504  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [19]
___ Hi, I hope so. Try 9.2.5-pre4 or later. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology _< >_
proxy https
  09/22-22:23 . 3505  KINOSHITA Toshio <pwegqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [26]
___ はじめまして、木下と申します. delegateを利用して、他のProxyへ転送したいと考えております. 以下のような状況です. [PC] ---> [delegate] ---> [proxy] ---(internet)---> [http/https sites] HTTPの転送は出来
Transparent UDP relaying over SOCKS
  09/25-04:47 . 3506  David Ponzone <pwigqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [94]
___ Hello all, I have a weird requirement for transparent UDP relaying over SOCKS5. Let me explain myself. I have an IP-Phone A connected to my MacOSX, which acts as a routeur to Internet. The IP-Phone
delegte credhy
  09/26-04:15 . 3507  Martin Papadopoulos <payeabdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [40]
___ hello yutaka, when using credhy for delegate <=> encryption i get the message " ... bad key" how exactly should an encryption with delegate-master and Credhy be invoked ? example: ... FSV="-credhy"
  09/27-23:55 . 3508  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, It has not been implemented for MASTER and SOCKS. I uploaded 9.2.5-pre7 which includes the implementation of it. It's CRYPT=pass:"Key" with which Credhy encoder/decoder is initialized with the K
Transparent UDP relaying over SOCKS
  09/28-00:11 . 3509  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [47]
___ Hi, Intercepting packets over IP is not the role of DeleGate as an application level proxy, as it is not the role of a transparent proxy for HTTP. It should be configured with some appropriate tools
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  09/28-21:33 . 3510  Steve Brown <pd4gqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [19]
___ Hi all, Is it possible to configure delegate as an ftp proxy, so that a plain ftp client can connect to a remote site, and *if* that remote site supports TLS have delegate start a TLS encrypted sess
Transparent UDP relaying over SOCKS
  09/28-22:54 . 3511  David Ponzone <pwigqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [273]
___ Yutaka San, Thanks for this. I setup ipfw to forward the desired packets to 127.0.0.1:1080/udp. Now, I am not sure I can use delegate to listen on 1080/udp and forward the packets transparently thro
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  09/29-03:46 . 3512  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [40]
___ At least it should be as follows: ./delegated -P21 SERVER=ftp MOUNT="/* ftp://server/*" STLS=-fsv The protocol name "ftps:" means using TLS over a dedicated port (990) without negotiation procedure
Transparent UDP relaying over SOCKS
  09/29-04:01 . 3513  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, It can be as this: delegated -P1080 SERVER=udprelay://UDPhost:UDPport SOCKS=128.0.0.0:1080 Note that a single destination port of the UDP (UDPhost:UDPport) need to be specified because there is
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  09/29-04:19 . 3514  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [18]
___ Hi, I'm reminded that it is true for protocols like HTTP in which a client talks first, but it's not the case in FTP in which server talks first. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org>
Question on installation of delegate on windows
  10/02-10:36 . 3515  "Tet Cheng Chia" <pxmgqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [35]
___ Hi, I am trying to install Delegate on Windows 2003. I have the following questions: 1) Should I be able to see delegated.exe anywhere after installation? Currently this is missing. 2) How do I chec
Multihomed HTTP proxy and SRCIF
  10/04-02:13 . 3516  "Igor Lidin" <pxqgqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [53]
___ Hi, I'm trying to setup multi-IP HTTP proxy on a machine which has multiple network interfaces. My goal is to setup multiple http proxies on multihomed server to allow proxy clients to present diffe
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  10/04-19:38 . 3517  Steve Brown <ps4gabdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [19]
___ Thanks for the obvious point I missed! In the above example, I think MOUNT="/* ftp://server/*" means for all directories connect to 'server' and cd to the original path? In the log file I can see De
Uploading problem with HTTP(S) POST
  10/05-00:36 . 3518  "Jae Hwang" <pxygqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [260]
___ Hi, I have a problem in uploading a relatively large file throught http(s) post (multipart form data). I have tried to search the previous mail archives for a possible solution as well as to change
  10/05-04:17 . 3519  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [35]
___ Hi, Hmm... DeleGate seems not to coped with the 100 (Continue) status from the server during relaying of POST request body. I made a workaround about it and uploaded the modified version as 9.2.5-pr
DeleGate with SSL encryption for a MSSQL
  10/05-04:33 . 3520  "Jae Hwang" <pxygqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [79]
___ Hi, Just curious if it is possible to estblish a SSL-encrypted connection between a MSSQL client and the DeleGate, and a normal connection between the DeleGate and a MSSQL server. I have tried: dele
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  10/05-07:04 . 3521  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ It can be done like a usual FTP proxy with STLS=-fsv as follows: delegated -P21 SERVER=ftp STLS=-fsv Then user can select a target server with USER or CWD command. USER user@server or USER user PASS
DeleGate with SSL encryption for a MSSQL
  10/05-08:42 . 3522  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [39]
___ Hi, The problem is whether or not the client is talking in SSL. If the client is talking in SSL, the problem is what "[12]", 0x12, sent from the client means. It is not a SSLv3 packet, but it can be
Uploading problem with HTTP(S) POST
  10/05-08:58 . 3523  "Jae Hwang" <pxygqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [63]
___ Hi, Yutaka, It works great!!! Thank you for your help... Regards, Jae --- Original Message --- From: "Yutaka Sato" <feedback@delegate.org> To: <feedback@delegate.org> Cc: <e115138@hotmail..> Sent: W
  10/05-09:05 . 3524  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [39]
___ Hi, Can I see the log around the POST corresponding to the following ? (to be sure wheter the fix is working as I expected) Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y
  10/05-11:28 . 3525  "Jae Hwang" <pyugqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [154]
___ Hi, Yutaka, Here is the requested log. Thanks, Jae 0/04 22:19:48.44 [7008] 1+2/2/2: POST REQBODY 0 / 0 : ready = 2646582 0/04 22:19:48.44 [7008] 1+2/2/2: POST REQBODY 8192 / 0 : ready = 2646582 0/04
DeleGate with SSL encryption for a MSSQL
  10/05-12:50 . 3526  "Jae Hwang" <pyugqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [113]
___ Hi, Yutaka, The suggested args (both STLS and FCL with -dv) have been tried, and the related logs are shown below. thanks, Jae (1) delegated.exe -P11433 SERVER="tcprelay://localhost:1433" STLS=fcl -
  10/05-17:14 . 3527  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [40]
___ Hi, Hmm... This packet seems not the one in SSL. Maybe the packet is the one in TDS for authentication in which the usage of SSL is negotiated. So it is necessary to interpret at least the authentic
Uploading problem with HTTP(S) POST
  10/05-17:23 . 3528  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [30]
___ Hi, Thank you. I confirmed that the modification is working as I expected. This "HTTP/1.1 100 Continue" from the server is what must have been interpreted by DeleGate and forwarded to the client. Ch
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  10/05-22:53 . 3529  Steve Brown <ps4gabdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [28]
___ Hi Yutaka, Yes, thanks for that. I tried that approach originally and looked elsewhere when it didn't work. Sadly I didn't look in the right place during testing, and it was working all along... Is
  10/06-02:50 . 3530  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [52]
___ Hi, I'm not so sure about your requirement but a simple notification of the usage of SSL with the FTP server can be done in the response message as follows: 230-- @ @ --[SSL]-- 230 \( - )/ -- { conn
Multihomed HTTP proxy and SRCIF
  10/06-04:04 . 3531  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ Hi, SRCIF seems not interpreted when it is used in INETD. Instead, you can use it in more usual way without INETD as follows: -P10.0.0.2:3129 SERVER=http SRCIF=10.0.0.2 Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sat
  10/06-04:27 . 3532  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [48]
___ Hi, I found why SRCIF is disabled with INETD. Simply it's not initialzed. It can be fixed as the enclosed patch. It will be applied to the next release (9.2.5-pre12). Thank you for your notice. Chee
intercepting HTTP/HTTPS and its conversion using delegate
  10/06-13:40 . 3533  "Lito Kusnadi" <pzugqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [31]
___ Hi, I'm new to delegate. I am faced with a problem as follow: I have an application server which transfer XML file to a remote server using the HTTP POST method. The application server I have cannot
  10/06-15:01 . 3534  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [25]
___ Hi, Mediating between a HTTP client and a HTTPS server can be done with a DeleGate (as a "reverse proxy") which accepts a connection in HTTP from a client then connects to a server in HTTPS as folow
  10/06-15:10 . 3535  "Lito Kusnadi" <pzugqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [40]
___ Hi Yutaka, In your example, using port 8888, is it necessary to use port other than 80? Or you assumed port 80 was used when you created the example? Thks. Lito Kindly Regards, Lito Kusnadi
  10/06-15:15 . 3536  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [14]
___ You can use any port if you can use it. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology _< >_
Multihomed HTTP proxy and SRCIF
  10/06-23:22 . 3537  "Igor Lidin" <pxqgqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [22]
___ Hi, release (9.2.5-pre12). Thank you for your notice. Thank you, it works now, but in the following configuration INETD="10.0.0.1:3128 - - - - - SERVER=http SRCIF=10.0.0.1" INETD="10.0.0.1:3129 - -
  10/07-04:12 . 3538  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, I did not intend INETD to be used for HTTP in which a DeleGate process is reused for multiple connections from clients to cope with heavily repeated connections. The reuse can be disabled with t
  10/07-12:26 . 3539  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [62]
___ Hi, I uploaded 9.2.5-pre13 in which the above MAXIMA is set by default when INETD is specified. By the way, using INETD for HTTP can make overhead which is not negligible in a practical usage. So it
HTTP to HTTPS conversion problem
  10/09-13:55 . 3540  "Lito Kusnadi" <pzugqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [155]
___ Hi, I managed to compile the delegate sourcecode in Linux Centos 4.3. I used a config file to run delegate as follow: -P8000 SERVER=http -v MOUNT="/* https://online.toll.com.au/*" STLS=fsv:https HOS
  10/09-16:18 . 3541  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [45]
___ Hi, The reason of the failure is the failure of dynamic loading of SSL libraries. You seems not have the SSL libraries on an appropriate directory (typically /usr/lib or /lib). This shows that your
ftp to ftp gateway +(optional TLS)
  10/09-22:01 . 3542  Steve Brown <ps4gabdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [129]
___ Hi Yutaka, I'm experiencing odd things when I use Delegate to act as a TLS FTP gateway like you kindly described. Essentially, a non-TLS capable client when connecting via Delegate to a TLS capable
  10/10-00:12 . 3543  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [136]
___ Hi, What is this "controlport-2" and "controlport-2" ? Seeing what the difference is between the case of the failure and the success will be helpful. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.
HTTP to HTTPS conversion problem
  10/10-08:57 . 3544  "Lito Kusnadi" <pzugqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org> [69]
___ Thanks Yutaka, I'll try to compile again. By the way, would delegate be possible to remember the initial connectivity? This is the illustration: traffic converted from HTTP to HTTPS) When RemoteServ
  10/10-09:05 . 3545  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [27]
___ You have /usr/lib/libssl.so ? If so and you compiled DeleGate without modification (without options like -static), any recompilation will not be useful to solve the problem. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutak
delegate security flaw [Virus checked]
  10/18-18:38 . 3546  p3igqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org [49]
___ hello yutaka, i recently discovered a security flaw which is related to the delegate permission control allthough using a filter like FCL="sslway ... -Vrfy" , when running in master mode , clients w
  10/18-20:46 . 3547  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [47]
___ Hi, Maybe you are using a version of DeleGate older than DeleGate/9.2.5-pre7. As written in <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/tls/> after DeleGate/9.0 I'm shifting to STLS=fcl,fsv instead obsole
  10/18-21:05 . 3548  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi, I found that FCL,FSV=sslway with MASTER is not disabled in the latest vesion. It'll be disabled in 9.2.5. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) N
Antwort: Re: [DeleGate-En:3553] delegate security flaw [Virus checked]
  10/18-21:26 . 3549  p3igqbdyi-6rjyzcpoy23r.ml@ml.delegate.org [204]
___ Hello Yutaka, even with stls this is not the case ! the permission is denied after an initial relay has been made to an arbitrary server. therefore the delegate master process still is vulnerable to
  10/18-21:46 . 3550  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [19]
___ Hi, If SSL is failed with STLS=fcl, MASTER DeleGate (with SERVER=delegate) cannot know any of client's request including the desitination server, so it cannot connect to anywhere. I think so. Cheers
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:01/22 03:40:13 (2 sec) Expires:01/22 09:40:11 @_@V