Hi, In message <_A3573@delegate-en.ML_> on 11/11/06(08:22:07) I wrote: |In message <_A3572@delegate-en.ML_> on 11/11/06(06:42:08) |you "Tetsu Saiga" <p6qgqbdyi-mxhgu44xf33w.ml@delegate.org> wrote: | |I'm trying to have Delegrate run as a Application level router that | |will switch to either a HTTP proxy or SOCKS base on the port. | | | |If it's port 80 then it should use a HTTP proxy and SOCKS for everything else. | | | |I'm using CONNECT to switch but it doesn't seem to be working. The | |limit for port 80 using {*:{80}} doesn't block everything else from | |using the HTTP proxy. | |As far as I remember, I've never announced that DeleGate supports |relaying as a circuit level proxy as SOCKS and forwarding to an |application level proxy as a HTTP proxy, although I've been |interested about it since it might be utilized like the IP level |forwarder for "transparent" HTTP proxy in a more smart way. I prototyped it in DeleGate version 9.4.1-pre2. With it, you don't need multiple-DeleGates for SOCKS and HTTP cache connected with TCP but only a single DeleGate for a SOCKS will act as a HTTP caching proxy after the negotition in the SOCKS protocol completed. The DeleGate to be used in this way can be configured as follows. % delegated -P1080 SERVER=socks CACHE=do REMITTABLE=+,http,ftp See <URL:http://www.delegate.org/delegate/sockstap/> |With the current feature of DeleGate, it seems capable with a |configuration as follows: | | delegated -P1080 SERVER=socks \ | ROUTE="http://localhost:8080-_-{*:80}" \ | SOCKS=localhost:1081 \ | |This utilization of DeleGate suppose that the HTTP client sends a |resolvable hostname of the destination server in its Host: header filed, |which is likely to be the same with the one in the parameter of CONNECT |request of the SOCKS protocol as follows: | | SOCKS CONNECT serverhost:80 | ... | HTTP GET /path HTTP/1.1 | Host: serverhost | ... | |Note that the "PROXY" parameter in your example supposes the upstream |server talks the same protocol with the client's one, so it cannot be |used in this case. And you don't need the CONNECT parameter in this case. Cheers, Yutaka -- 9 9 Yutaka Sato <pfqcabdyi-mxhgu44xf33w.ml@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology _< >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller