Yutaka Sato wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message <_A3731@delegate-en.ML_> on 05/11/07(00:36:45)
> you Corley Kinnane <psmhabdyi-mxhgu44uqh3w.ml@delegate.org> wrote:
>  |    I have a problem where I have a group of machines on a local subnet
>  |with a box that acts as a NAT to allow internet out but not allow
>  |internet into the subnet directly.
>  |If I want to setup a proxy on the NAT machine for VMware, can I use
>  |delegate to proxy the VMware connection ?
>  |
>  |VMware server has remote access on port 902 - you just use the special
>  |client to connect to this port, however, like ftp, it generates dynamic
>  |ports to return to the client side.
>
> Does not the client support SOCKS(BIND) as FTP clients do?
>
>   
I don't know - Is the SOCKS method the way dynamic ports are allocated ?
Does this mean I can use a SOCKS proxy at the gateway and the dynamic
ports will be opened there ?

VMware does not have options for connection - I found there were 4
dynamic ports by sniffing the interface.

Corley.

>  |Server        Client
>  |:902
>  |                 :59556     (dynamic)
>  |                 :59557     (dynamic)
>  |                 :59558     (dynamic)
>  |                 :59559     (dynamic)
>  |
>  |Its easy to relay the port 902 from the NAT box into the subnet, but how
>  |can I use delegate to receive the dynamic ports and tunnel them back to
>  |the client machine?
>  |Considering they are dynamic and change for each connection, I don't if
>  |this can be done at all.
>
> Cheers,
> Yutaka
> --
>   9 9   Yutaka Sato <pfqcabdyi-mxhgu44uqh3w.ml@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/
>  ( ~ )  National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
> _<   >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
> Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller
>
>   


-- 
Time keeps turning round,
It knows little of its past,
Stay upon your path.