Articles delegate-en/4260-4270 of [1-5169] on the server localhost:119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4260 - 4270   digest:
FTP PASV port range
  12/06-10:28 . 4260  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [54]
___ Hi, I feel your description of the problem, logging and configuration are almost perfect. no. At a glance, it is strange that only SRCIF has a value with double quotes unwrapped even in the internal
  12/06-13:06 . 4261  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [96]
___ Hi, I have some other suggestions about the configuration of FTP-DeleGate: 1) running DeleGate in a firewall internally It is more desirable to run DeleGate internally to avoid possible unknown atta
sockmux over socks proxies
  12/12-01:39 . 4262  Deborah Charan <puyiabdyi-elpg7al7qmhr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [46]
___ I can't seem to get delegate to work correctly, and am wondering what I have misunderstood? I am looking for using a chained socks proxy to forward over a tunnel, it looks like sockmux should do it.
TECHNICAL REPORT INQUIRY / URGENT (our ref: 146-671427)
  12/12-04:45 . 4263  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [25]
___ Hi, You can find it at <URL:ftp://ftp.delegate.org/pub/DeleGate/doc/> but it is in PostScript and in Japanese :) Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~
sockmux over socks proxies
  12/12-05:05 . 4264  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [18]
___ Hi, It means that the functionality is not available in the source distribution of DeleGate. Try it with the binary distribution instead please. <URL:http://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/4
  12/12-06:08 . 4265  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [58]
___ Hi, Only a single persistent TCP connection for SockMux between two DeleGate servers (between hostA and hostB in your case) is used. Therefore only a single socket buffer is consumed for this connec
TECHNICAL REPORT INQUIRY / URGENT (our ref: 146-671427)
  12/12-07:00 . 4266  "Hiroko Jusko" <pviiabdyi-elpg7al7qmhr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [43]
___ Dear Dr. Sato, Thank you for the link to the report. Best Regards, Hiroko The Research Investment, Inc. ---Original Message--- From: Yutaka Sato [mailto:feedback@delegate.org] Sent: Thursday, Decemb
SOCKMUX
  12/16-02:35 . 4267  Deborah Charan <puyiabdyi-elpg7al7qmhr.ml@ml.delegate.org> [44]
___ I'm currently using version 9.8.5 because it looks like that has sockmux functionality. I couldn't use the binary distribution because I'm using FreeBSD 5.3 I can't get the system to work as I would
  12/16-16:00 . 4268  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [18]
___ Hi, You can use the binary file distributed named "freebsd-dg" which is for FreeBSD5.X compiled on FreeBSD 5.3. Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ )
  12/16-17:32 . 4269  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [35]
___ Hi, If you saw a message like 'Forbidden xx.xx.xx.xx:xxxx' in your log of DeleGate (xx.xx.xx.xx is the IP-address of hostB), the failure is due to the default access control. The access control for
  12/17-14:11 . 4270  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [40]
___ Hi, I'm not sure what is "my example" but as you noticed, the host:port value of the SOCKS parameter is not cared in the current implementation and something like SOCKS="-:0" also works. A SOCKS par
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:02/18 02:07:33 (1 sec) Expires:02/18 08:07:32 @_@V