I'll try it ASAP.
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
Dipartimento di Storia delle Arti
Universita` di Pisa
piazza S.Matteo in Soarta, 2 - I56127 Pisa (Italy)
fax.+30-000-00000F; e-mail: <f.bianchi@unipi..it>
!DISCLAIMER!: my e-mail reflects _my_own_ opinions!
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Yutaka Sato wrote:
> In message <_A4430@delegate-en.ML_> on 04/10/09(16:38:53)
> you Federico Bianchi <email@example.com> wrote:
> |Hello. Kudos aside for your nice work, I'd like to handle the following
> |1) authenticate via PAM (local user)
> |2) as a fallback, use an external LDAP server (in a future, I might
> | reverse them)
> |3) if no valid credential has been passed to DeleGate, fallback over a
> | whitelist
> |I can easily handle the first and the second case (though I'd like to
> |avoid the pam_ldap I have been using for my test configurations and use
> |LDAP directly), but so far I haven't been able to find out how to handle
> |whitelists in DeleGate; moreover, I don't know how to combine the rules to
> |enforce the "right" priority.
> I'm not so sure about your requirment but it could be realized with
> an AUTHORIZER parameter like this:
> 9 9 Yutaka Sato <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/
> ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
> _< >_ 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8568 Japan
> Do the more with the less -- B. Fuller