Articles delegate-en/4490-4500 of [1-5017] on the server localhost:7119
  upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
search
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
range 4490 - 4500   digest:
IPv6 SRCIF support
  06/25-17:28 . 4490  Chris Murton <priiqbdyi-qa4rnug36za6.ml@delegate.org> [85]
___ Hi, I was wondering if there are plans to support the setting of the source IPv6 address of outgoing traffic from Delegate (as per SRCIF for IPv4 connections)? Thanks, Chris
  06/26-02:26 . 4491  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [17]
___ Hi, I'm not so sure but SRCIF seems supporting IPv6 already... Cheers, Yutaka 9 9 Yutaka Sato <y.sato@delegate.org> http://delegate.org/y.sato/ ( ~ ) National Institute of Advanced Industrial Scienc
  06/26-03:16 . 4492  Chris Murton <priiqbdyi-qa4rnug36za6.ml@delegate.org> [27]
___ Hi Yutaka, How about in a condition where the proxy has both IPv4 and IPv6 networks attached to it, and you want to specify a different outgoing source address for both v4 and v6? :) Thanks, Chris
  06/26-03:40 . 4493  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [22]
___ Hi, You can specify multiple SRCIF conditionally on the address family of the destination using a pseudo hostname "_4" and "_6" for IPv4/IPv6 respectively. Thus it could be as this for example: SRCI
  06/26-03:57 . 4494  Chris Murton <priiqbdyi-qa4rnug36za6.ml@delegate.org> [29]
___ Hi Yutaka, That's working perfectly, thanks for your help! Chris
  06/26-04:08 . 4495  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [36]
___ Hi Chris, Since I have no real experience with IPv6, feedbacks like yours are very welcome. Yutaka
match for X-Request
  07/01-03:07 . 4496  Jens-Erik Hansen <puicqbdyi-qa4rnug36za6.ml@delegate.org> [34]
___ Hello Yutaka, I currently try to match for X-Request or X-Request-Original in an xml-secure stream. A very basic CFI-script like this one: #!cfi Header-Filter: -tee-n-v /dev/tty shows the following
  07/01-12:29 . 4497  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [47]
___ Hi Jens, You are right. Selecting a FTOCL filter over HTTP with CFI's "X-Request" condition has been disabled since 9.2.3-pre4, in which conditional CFI for FTOCL was modified to reduce the overhead
  07/01-21:51 . 4498  Jens-Erik Hansen <puicqbdyi-qa4rnug36za6.ml@delegate.org> [64]
___ Hello Yutaka, thank you very much for your reply. Today I tried delegate 9.9.4-pre9 and I made some extraordinary experiences trying to accomplish my task which leads me to the assumption that I mad
  07/03-03:33 . 4499  feedback@delegate.org (Yutaka Sato) [89]
___ Hi Jens, The following test works with 9.9.4-pre9 but not work with 9.9.4-pre8. [url.cfi] #!cfi X-Request-URL: /test/test.txt Header-Filter: -tee-n-v ---(1) without SSL [server] delegated -P9999 -fv
DeleGate: question regarding the PROTOLOG parameters
  07/03-22:38 . 4500  "Kopplinger, Andreas" <psqiqbdyi-qa4rnug36za6.ml@delegate.org> [81]
___ Yutaka Sato, I have a question regarding the PROTOLOG parameters. At the moment, the startscript contains the following: PROTOLOG='${LOGDIR}/Protolog_${PORT}.${PROTO}[date+.%d]' It would like to use
  admin search upper oldest olders older1 this newer1 newers latest
[Top/Up] [oldest] - [Older+chunk] - [Newer+chunk] - [newest + Check]
Generated:02/09 16:55:34 (3 sec) Expires:02/09 22:55:31 @_@V